Notes
Outline
Novel Less Lethal Ammunitions
Outline
Introduction and Background
Existing Less Lethal Ammunitions
Design Principles
Biomechanics Background
Composite Preparation
Mechanical Testing
Blunt Impact Testing
Conclusions
Introduction
To date, there is no satisfactory replacement of traditional lethal police or military firearms with less-lethal weapon in certain life and death situations.  (Button, Toronto Metropolitan Police Research Report, 2001)
Project Objectives
Advantages of LLA
Simple concept /compact / light weight (15 to 40 g)
Immediate incapacitation “..comparable to a vigorous punch.”
Adequate stand off distance ( 2 to 15 m)
Consistent and reliable
Health safety (no chemical / electrical shock)
Low Cost
Minimum additional training requirements.
Existing Less Lethal Ammunitions (LLAs)
Lethality of Existing “less lethal ammunitions”
“Any thoracic penetration may result in an acute life-threatening injuries such as tension pneumothorax, hemothorax, massive cardiac injury with tamponade, great vessel injury, hemoptysis, and lung collapse may occur.” Charles, A. et al., J. Trauma. 2002; 53:997-1000
Inaccuracy of Rubber Bullets
Blunt and penetrating injuries caused by rubber bullets during the Israeli-Arab conflict in October, 2000.
Disadvantages of Existing LLA
Poor aerodynamics, not effective at long rang, e.g bean bag and sock rounds.
Toxic material, e.g. lead in sock and tube rounds.
Hard thermoplastics, (Shore A hardness > 80), e.g. Baton round: Polyurethane or polypropylene.
Thermoset elastomers, (Shore A hardness > 60), e.g. Tube and Rocket rounds (EPDM/ SBR + inorganic filler).
Costly to process/ manufacture.
Lethal, in cold climates.
Design Principles
 Material Properties in a wide temperature and frequency range:
Hardness
Creep
Damping
 Impact Biomechanics
Maximum Tolerable Energy/Force/Deflection
 Aerodynamics
Accuracy
Human Model Ballistic Impactor
Human Model Ballistic Impactor- Results
New Projectile-Wasp
Density: 2.4 g/cm3
Weight:  20 gauge- 15 grams
    12 gauge- 25 grams
Material Selection
Ingredients:
Thermoplastic Elastomers: for structure stability and ease of processing.
Poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS),  (Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan).
Styrene-Butadiene- Styrene (SBS)
Styrene-Isoprene-Styrene (SIS)
Elastomers: for the damping and rubbery property.
Butyl elastomer (IIR), (Bayer Inc, Sarnia)
Natural Rubber (NR)
Metal Powder: to increase the density of the composite.
Iron powder, (Quebec Metal Powders Limited).
Sample Preparation
Mixing Conditions:
10 minutes per batch
35 RPM
140-160oC
Composition Optimization
Equipment: Haake’s DEFO-Elastomer instrument
Specimen: 10 mm diameter by 10 mm height.
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA)
DMA in tension: GABO EPLEXOR
10 Hz
-100 to 100 oC
DMA in compression: MTS 831
50, 0 and –50 oC;
0.01 to 500 Hz;
7% static and 3% dynamic deformation;
Sample: 10 mm diameter by 10 mm height.
Analyzed Samples:
Rubber Rocket, Triple Ball, Lead Filled Rubber
     (Tube) and the Mono-Ball projectiles.
The newly developed composites.
Damping Analysis of Various Block Co-polymers Using the DMA
E’-Comparative Analysis
Tan δ-Comparative Analysis
Time Temperature Superposition for SIBS50
Impact frequency at 12% deformation and 250 ft/s is equivalent to:
21,111 Hz for the 20-gauge projectile.
16,170 Hz for the 12 gauge projectile.
New Impact Testing Method
DOW Styrofoam SM and Defender 1 mounted on a robot.
Equipment Setup:
Energy Transfer Tests
Accuracy Tests
Less Lethal Products
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Materials and Manufacturing Ontario MMO.
MERC group.
Elisabeth Takacs, Research Engineer
  McMaster University
Prof. Dr.-Ing.Volker Altstädt, Ph.D.
Department of Polymer Engineering, University of Bayreuth, Germany.
Lamperd Less Lethal Staff-Training with WASP
Jack ASS Movie- Training with SR.
Impact trauma from the Defender I fired at 15 feet. No penetration, but a very nasty bruise. Non-lethal and very incapacitating.